I
recently stumbled upon a copy of the 2006 translation of the Aeneid by Robert Fagles; written by the
Roman poet Virgil and widely regarded as one of the greatest works in Latin
literature, the Aeneid spans twelve
books and compiles various legends surrounding the origin myth of Rome and its
hero Aeneas, a Trojan. Although I did not get a chance to read through the poem
this week, I was inspired to do some basic research about the genre of epic
poetry and the theory of a ‘monomyth’ and theorize about their overall purpose.
Defined by the English Oxford Dictionary as
“A poem, typically derived from ancient oral tradition, which celebrates in the
form of a continuous narrative the achievements of one or more heroic
characters of history or legend,” the epic is formulaic in structure and tells
the story of a “heroic-age” in the history of a civilization. The epic is
narrated by a formal, objective voice, and can take hours or days to perform
depending on its length. Epics serve an important social function, as they
solidify national identity by describing founding myths and national heroes;
they are typically the product of a society where warlike nobility seeks to
perform heroic actions to obtain fame for themselves and their lineage.
An
important theory of mythology that relates heavily to epics and literature is
the existence of a ‘monomyth,’ or “hero’s journey,” first introduced by Joseph
Campbell in his book The Hero With A
Thousand Faces. This theory proposes the idea that there is a general
structure that all myths created by human civilizations and cultures follow. It
describes the trend of a hero venturing from the known into the unknown after
being called to action by an external force; in this unknown world, the hero is
transformed through a series of trials, and returns home having acquired
benefits to bestow upon others. This structure can be observed in many epics;
for example, in the Aeneid, Aeneas
ventures out into the unknown as he flees the destroyed city of Troy, and
ultimately returns to the known as he settles in Latium.
Having
defined and introduced both the epic poetry genre and the theory of a
‘monomyth,’ we can now discuss why they were created by societies and what that
means for our modern-day world. As mentioned previously, the epic poem serves
to establish a strong national identity by recounting myths about a heroic
figure in its founding history; in this way, it motivates the warrior
aristocracy to perform heroic actions to obtain fame, thus benefiting society
overall. The monomyth also encourages actions that will provide a civilization
with benefits; by describing how venturing into the unknown brings one benefit,
the monomyth encourages the members of a society to explore the unknown and
therefore obtain more territory for themselves. Therefore, we can infer that
the myths described by both epic poetry and the monomyth theory are the
inventions of a budding civilization that needs to develop a strong national
identity and acquire more resources for that identity; therefore, it creates
myths and uses them to encourage resource-seeking through fighting with
neighboring civilizations and exploration, furthering its agenda in a manner
akin to modern propaganda. Overall, both epic poetry and the monomyth
demonstrate how people can be influenced by the stories that society tells and
the common themes it perpetuates. Thus, as writers, we should be careful about
what we convey in our work, as it will influence the thinking and decisions of
the people who read it.
- Jade Li
Works
Cited
Gill, N. S. "The
Genre of Epic Literature and Poetry." ThoughtCo, 10 May 2019,
www.thoughtco.com/epic-literature-and-poetry-119651. Accessed 15 Oct. 2020.
"Monomyth: The
Hero's Journey Project." Berkeley ORIAS, Berkeley UC,
orias.berkeley.edu/resources-teachers/monomyth-heros-journey-project. Accessed
16 Oct. 2020.
Yoshida, Atsuhiko.
"Epic." Encyclopædia Britannica, 18 Oct. 2019,
www.britannica.com/art/epic. Accessed 16 Oct. 2020.
The Aeneid was an important work for Roman society at the time. It lauded Aeneas as an embodiment of Roman values and the founder of their civilization and compared him to Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, who could be counted as a re-founder of Rome. It definitely favored the ruling dynasty at the time, even claiming that Augustus' adoptive family lineage directly descended from one of Aeneas' sons.
ReplyDelete